Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel T. Moeller, M.S.Ed.'s avatar

I totally agree with a lot of what you’ve written here! Instead of preaching to the choir, I’ll pull out the one piece I don’t fully agree with. You talk about the life force being more centralized in adults, and while I recognize this explanation as a cultural belief and even symbolic, I find it to be a bit lacking in explaining the disconnect between adults and young people—especially in terms of play. I do think you continue to explain one of the big reasons for the disconnect: the systems we exist in, especially the crushing weight of capitalism and all that it brings. I think play is possible (natural, even) in adults and mainly through burnout and a resultant lack of presence, curiosity, time, and general capacity that we lose that ability.

I think adults can play in similar ways as children but naturally, our play tends to shift based on our experience/age and interests. Pretend tea parties don’t have the same attraction to an adult because we’ve already explored those interpersonal relations so much that they’re just not interesting any more. But, at age 40 I still love a good game of tag with young people of any age—especially because I love all things movement. I still love wordplay and finding humor that connects for young people.

And I think Peter Gray (as awesome as he’s been to the movement) would laughably disagree with both of us in saying that children need to play with their peers away from adults. And that’s just not consistent with the reality I know.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?